Intimidation, Apprehension and Aspiration as Mumbai Slum Dwellers Await the Bulldozers
For months, intimidating communications persisted. Originally, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, later from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was called to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.
Shaikh is among those resisting a multimillion-dollar initiative where one of India's largest slums – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – will be razed and transformed by a large business group.
"The unique ecosystem of this area is unparalleled in the globe," states Shaikh. "However they want to destroy our social fabric and silence our voices."
Opposing Environments
The dank gullies of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and elite residences that overshadow the settlement. Residences are constructed informally and often missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the air is filled with the suffocating smell of open sewers.
For certain residents, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and homes with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision come true.
"There's no proper healthcare, proper streets or water management and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," says a tea vendor, fifty-six, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in the early eighties. "The single option is to clear the area and provide modern residences."
Resident Opposition
Yet certain residents, like this protester, are fighting against the redevelopment.
All recognize that this community, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is desperately requiring investment and development. But they worry that this initiative – lacking resident participation – is one that will turn valuable urban land into an elite enclave, forcing out the lower-caste, migrant communities who have resided there since the nineteenth century.
This involved these marginalized, displaced people who built up the uninhabited area into a widely studied marvel of self-reliance and business activity, whose production is valued at between one million dollars and a substantial sum per year, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.
Resettlement Issues
Of the roughly one million inhabitants living in the crowded sprawling zone, a minority will be able for new homes in the redevelopment, which is expected to take a significant period to finish. Others will be transferred to wastelands and salt plains on the distant periphery of the metropolis, potentially fragment a historic neighborhood. Certain individuals will be denied residences at all.
Those allowed to stay in Dharavi will be allocated apartments in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, collective approach of dwelling and laboring that has sustained the community for so long.
Commercial activities from tailoring to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be moved to a designated "industrial sector" distant from homes.
Existential Threat
For residents like Shaikh, a leather artisan and third generation of his family to live in the slum, the project presents an existential threat. His makeshift, multi-level facility produces apparel – formal jackets, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – marketed in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and abroad.
His family resides in the rooms downstairs and laborers and garment workers – workers from different regions – live on-site, allowing him to manage costs. Beyond the slum, housing costs are often 10 times more expensive for a single room.
Threats and Warning
In the official facilities nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project shows a very different outlook. Well-groomed inhabitants gather on bicycles and electric vehicles, purchasing international baked goods and breakfast items and having coffee on a patio outside Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. This represents a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that sustains local residents.
"This represents no development for us," explains Shaikh. "It represents a massive property transaction that will price people out for our community to continue."
Additionally, there exists skepticism of the corporate group. Run by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the government head – the business group has faced accusations of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it denies.
Although administrative bodies describes it as a partnership, the business group contributed a significant amount for its majority share. Legal proceedings alleging that the project was unfairly awarded to the developer is under review in India's supreme court.
Ongoing Pressure
From when they initiated to actively protest the development, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been experienced a long-running campaign of harassment and intimidation – involving communications, clear intimidation and implications that speaking against the project was equivalent to speaking against the country – by people they claim work for the developer.
Included in these alleged to have delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c