🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is stored on the platform, and unexpectedly they want us to cover the cost for it."

Poor feedback and a feeling of unfairness have dominated online discussion since the app emerged as the newest digital platform to put a price tag on a service that users previously accessed for free.

The company behind Snapchat announced in September that it would start charging users if they have over five gigabytes worth of saved photos and clips stored as the Memories feature.

For many, these old snaps function as a portal to bygone days – leading some to blast the corporation of "corporate greed" in comments on social media and poor feedback on mobile app marketplaces.

Available Solutions

Snapchat's parent has likened its subscription options to those offered by major companies for handsets.

And as an alternative for users unwilling to subscribe, members can download their saved content – which for some amount to tens of gigabytes – to their personal gadget.

The firm mentioned that only a small number of members would be impacted by the new policy.

They recognized that it was "always challenging to move from receiving a service for free to subscribing to it" – but implied it would be "a valuable investment" for users.

Many criticising the move online appear unconvinced.

User Backlash

An online petition called the fee a "archival levy", with commenters labeling it "dystopian" and "outrageous" – while an individual vowed never to use the app in the future.

In parallel, in a one-star rating on the Google Play store, a person calling themselves Natacha Jonsson said it felt "morally questionable".

"As a member of that generation, many people have years worth of memories on the platform," they commented. "The vast majority only remained on the platform primarily for this purpose. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have extensive collections of recordings... Farewell Snapchat."

Furthermore, a journalism student, a university student media studies major in a major city, revealed on a social network her plans to uninstall the app.

"I made up my mind that I needed to download all my saved content as immediately," she mentioned. "Nearly every part of my teenage years have been documented through my saved snaps, all of the images in there are really important to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to demand payment people for something that has been free for a considerable period."

Unspecified Pricing

The platform has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would require in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

However 23-year-old another user, who is based in the city, said in a post on the social platform that she would be "upset" by the new costs.

The user explained that the service had become "a part of everyday life" since she first joined in several years ago.

While she said she understood the app needed to make money, Amber indicated that the Memories feature holds greater significance than the corporation may have anticipated.

"I think it's a somewhat inequitable step to demand payment from your subscribers who have been faithful and dedicated," she explained. "This feature is more than a name, these are our real-life recollections."

Expert Analysis

Firms deciding to charge from subscribers for a feature that was earlier without cost is nothing new, and countless individuals subscribe to services like iCloud and Google Drive to save their images and clips from their smartphone.

The reality of storing data in the cloud – which some in the tech industry like to refer to as simply "a remote system" – is that it involves expenses.

"Managing trillions of archived media on the service requires significant resources," social media consultant Matt Navarra explained. "The platform has to try to find a way to fund the operation of storage, bandwidth, back-ups, media distribution, encryption – all that stuff."

Yet the expert indicated that introducing fees for a function that had previously been free, and members had been encouraged to use as such, may feel like a "misleading tactic" for some.

"Altering the terms after individuals have built this extensive stored content feels inappropriate," he noted. And for many, he continued, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're emotional artefacts."

The sentiment was echoed by those submitting critical reviews, with a user calling their Snapchat photos and videos "the most precious thing to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my personal journey within them from happy occasions such as new additions, mourning of passed loved ones, times spent with loved ones, [and] my entire youth," they commented.

Academic Insight

A postdoctoral researcher, a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University in the the Low Countries, said that the platform's decision highlights the implications of for-profit services being used to save emotional private media.

"Platforms gain from this trust, mutual reliance, and expectation of continuous entry, which even encourages certain individuals to remain with the platform or continue to use it in order to revisit their stored media," she told the media. "However these are not altruistic protectors of personal memory."