🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase Black history and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.