🔗 Share this article

At first, Donald Trump appeared to adopt a firm position on Ukraine. Following issuing statements of "severe repercussions" in August should Putin persisted obstructing peace discussions, Trump eventually imposed considerable restrictions on the Russian two largest petroleum corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision significantly impacted Putin's ability to support his aggression in Ukraine.

Yet, through his recently unveiled detailed peace plan for Ukraine, that was developed by American and Russian representatives without Ukrainian or EU participation, the former president has apparently gone back to his favorable to Russia stance.

Benefiting Military Action

This initiative would effectively favor Putin for occupying Ukraine while putting the country's democracy in danger. Although strong declarations that "Ukraine's independence will be confirmed", much of the plan effectively weaken that very independence. What represents a Russian ideal would certainly be a disaster for Ukraine.

Reflecting his corporate background, Trump continues to treat the Ukrainian conflict as a mere border issue, like handing Russia a section of Ukrainian soil will appease the ruler. But, Russia's military campaign is not merely about controlling a damaged region of economically weakened area in Ukraine's east. Rather, it is about the nation's democracy – and Putin's clear desire to destroy it so it stops functions as an attractive standard for the Russia's population of the accountable leadership that Putin's deepening authoritarian rule prevents them.

Territorial Surrenders

While keeping in position the already split Ukrainian provinces of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the proposal would force Ukraine to give up the whole Donetsk region. Beyond rewarding the Russian Federation with area that its forces have been failed to seize in exceeding a decade of conflict, this surrender would leave Ukrainian military defenses dangerously undermined.

The area is the site of the nation's highly-touted "defensive line", the entrenched protective structures that represent a key obstacle to Russian advances. Trump would have the Ukrainian military leave these defenses, giving Putin a unobstructed route to Kyiv should he later choose to renew the hostilities.

Armed Forces Reductions

Furthermore, in a action that would make future hostilities easier for the Russian military, the plan would require Ukraine to reduce the scale of its military from their existing large number personnel to a cap of six hundred thousand. Notably, the proposal places no similar constraints on Russian forces.

Apparently as a accommodation to Putin's efforts to depict Ukraine's chosen by the people government as extremists, the plan declares: "Any radical belief system and activities must be opposed and forbidden." Apparently to highlight this element, it requires that "Ukraine will hold elections in three months" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, Trump sets no condition that Putin risk his regime by holding democratic processes in his own country.

Security Assurances

Certainly, the plan has the Russian Federation promise not to "invade other states" and to "establish in law its policy of non-violence towards the EU and Ukraine". But given that Putin has violated comparable accords in the history – including the 1994 agreement, in which Russia committed to honor the nation's borders in exchange for giving up its Soviet-era atomic arms, and the Minsk accords, in which Russia committed to a ceasefire and a handback of occupied land in eastern Ukraine to the government – how should the international community trust Putin this time?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so determined on external defense commitments. While the initiative threatens a "decisive joint defense action" should the Russian Federation restart its military campaign, and includes that "The nation will receive strong security guarantees", the particulars include vague to troubling. The initiative would not just prevent the nation Nato membership but also prevent member states from deploying forces on Ukraine's soil, effectively blocking the reassurance force, presumptively led by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to deter Putin from restoring his reduced forces, rearming, and attacking again.

World Reaction

Another side agreement according to sources would offer Ukraine with a similar to NATO protection assurance, in which any future "major, deliberate, and sustained military assault" by Russia on the country "will be treated as an act of war endangering the peace and security of the transatlantic community." This implies a defense action. Yet different from a powerful Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's primary deterrent against additional Russian aggression – the credibility of the side agreement would rely on the dedication of Nato leaders, such as the US administration, to react with force to Putin's hostilities, an action they have {not